Welcome to the Running Shoe Rx forums, for communication between sports medicine professionals, serious runners and industry insiders about running shoes and related topics.
You are currently viewing our running shoe forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community you will have access to post running shoe topics and running shoe reviews (as well as answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access many other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisments in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global running shoe community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
The initial experience in this shoe is stiff, but the ride improves with mileage. Unlike Nike’s Air cushioned shoes, our testers thought this shoe definitely needs some break-in mileage. While the new Shox cushioning system makes the shoe look “heel-centric,” testers were surprised by the well-cushioned (if a bit stiff) forefoot. The midfoot shank is highly protective, which contributes to making shoe appropriate for both neutral runners and slight overpronators. Some runners may note a bit of an abrupt transition due to the shank. The upper was loved for its looks, but not for its fit. It’s a bit stiff and very tall in the toebox.
This new shoe replaces the rubber heel columns that have been the hallmark of the Shox line with air-filled pillars. According to our tests, this new design results in soft heel cushioning, but testers noted that the shoe's overall ride felt firm. This could be due to the plastic footbridge Nike uses to address the abrupt heel-to-forefoot transition that plagued the original Shox design. Recommended for runners with normal to high arches who don't overpronate.